|
Post by Thomas More on Aug 1, 2011 20:50:47 GMT -5
Charles & Pope-
First off, regardless, congrats on being in the final 2. It is an accomplishment and I will not strip you of that.
POPE-
Game play wise you did play a shaddy game of words and leading people to impressionistic ideas. I did have every intention of taking William to the Finals, yes. So evicting him was the smart move. However, your decision to evict me, and throw Katherine, shows your character.
Your question, I would like you to pick 2 Jurors and replace them with you and Charles in the Final 2, and why they deserve to be there. With the jurors you did NOT put in the Final 2, why do they NOT deserve to be there?
I will say every bone in my body would rather kick you in the nuts then vote for you. So answer wisely.
CHARLES-
The presentation of floating and inactivity comes. You told me you were too busy with work, so answer me this.
Should you have quit the game when you got too busy to be fair to the rest of us? Furthermore, why do you deserve to win over Pope Paul, and who deserves to be in YOUR seat (any juror) other than yourself?
I also would rather kick myself then vote for you right now.
You both played shitty games. Pope relied on Charles' inactivity to clench him the win. Charles forced others to fight and him float to the top. So which is the better of two evils? We shall see.
-TM
|
|
|
Post by Pope Paul III on Aug 2, 2011 18:02:55 GMT -5
Hey Thomas, thanks for your comments and questions. I would like to first say something about "my character" being shown because I evicted you and "threw Katherine"? Which one? I'm still not sure what throwing Katherine means. If you mean Kitty... Throwing her off a bridge, out of a plane, off a cliff, under the bus? Because I never did any of those things. I never threw her under the bus. At least not intentionally. If you want to say that by me not throwing a veto comp when I was on the block is throwing her under the bus then okay... Go ahead and think that. I still voted to keep her. If you mean Katherine Howard, I tried to save her and I was late in posting the veto ceremony(which was obviously my fault) but it was YOUR choice to evict her and keep Charles, which leads me to believe you would have done the same thing to me in the final execution if you were given the chance. Evicting you was not a horrible move, I'm sorry. It just wasn't. You were going to win and I didn't work this hard just to get second. You said that I had "no balls" on aim to me yesterday. I disagree. The only thing that can be construed as cowardice is not telling you that I was going to evict you. If that loses me your vote, then so be it. Like I said, I won't sleep over it. But I think I'd have less balls by keeping you in the game and just accepting 2nd place. Keeping you and evicting Charles would show that I didn't have what it takes to win in the first place because I wasn't willing to make the difficult decisions. Yes we were aligned, but at least I played WITH you instead of just doing nothing and letting you make all the decisions in the game. I had to manipulate you a little bit so you wouldn't go after me since you were one of the strongest competitors. I'm sorry if what I've just said pisses you off but I'm being honest here. With or without your vote, I still hope I can win. But I would like to have your vote because not only do I deserve it, but it would show that jurors CAN get over things and not vote bitterly.
Now onto your questions...
:::Picking two jurors to be in the Final 2:::
You and Kitty.
Kitty got fucked, I agree. Had I realized sooner what exactly would have happened during the round she left instead of being so worried about my own safety, we both could have (possibly) stayed and then who knows what would have happened. She always played the game and was working towards a goal instead of just sitting back and letting other people make moves for her.
You... This is a no-brainer. Quite possibly the best player in the game. That is NOT me kissing your ass. But this is a fact. You were in the best position to be in the final 2 ALL GAME LONG. From your first HoH, to the second, and so on and so forth. You were probably the most social too. Although I can't speculate on that since not very many people were social in this game. But you clearly had deals with many people and I realize if you were in this positions, like I've said about 10 times before, you'd win the game.
:::Why the rest of the jury doesn't deserve to be in the final 2:::
First off, I feel like you're setting me up with this question. Who the hell am I to say why they shouldn't be here just because I am? Obviously, there are a few clear reasons but it's not always about why people don't "deserve" it but moreso about what people did or didn't do to make it this far. So that's what I'm basing this off of and NOT who I think deserves anything since that is completely irrelevant.
Thomas Cranmer - Perhaps he wasn't social enough or people felt that he wasn't going to back them up enough to warrant keeping him around. I can't really speculate. I voted him out because we didn't have any communication and I had deals with other players at this point. Jane Seymour - I think she kind of gave up after Kitty used her power on her. I thought she had a good shot at making the end though. Catherine Parr - She quit, unfortunately. :/ Katherine Howard - Idk if she made enough connections to keep herself in the game. It seemed like I was one of the only ones to reach out to her but it may have been too late. William Compton - He had a good deal going with you but I realized it in time and evicted him. I think had he actually competed in the Final 4 veto, he could have won and he'd probably be in my place right now.
Well thats it, man... If you have any more questions, I'm sure you will ask and I will answer them with all honesty just like I did here. Thanks again for your questions and good luck with your vote!
|
|
|
Post by Thomas More on Aug 2, 2011 20:33:42 GMT -5
My above questions were not meant to put you in a position, and I think it is a fair statement for you to openly and honestly admit why poeple don't deserve it. It is a game.
Pope, thank you for your answers. I will consider them greatly in the final vote.
Charles- looking forward to yours
|
|
|
Post by Pope Paul III on Aug 2, 2011 21:25:54 GMT -5
Yeah I gotcha... I was still honest with what I said anyways. Thanks again.
|
|